Liberals plan to impeach Trump!

cropped-trump.jpg

It is no surprise that since his inauguration President Donald Trump has faced increasing criticism. From day one, the mainstream media called his inauguration speech divisive, they made fun of the crowd size (failing to mention numerous parties of protestors/rioters were blocking entryways to the mall), they have criticized every single little step he has made. Just the other day CNN ran a story about how many scoops of ice cream he got compared to others, I mean really, that is news! That is promoting ideology and propaganda, not news.

What the liberal mainstream media, in collusion with the DNC, have planned since November 9th is to personally, aggressively and daily attack President Trump. There have been a vast number of attention grabbing headlines when in the end the “sources” didn’t pan out and the stories were proven false. But this is the mantra of the liberals, they don’t care what it takes, they plan to oust him at all costs.

Take for example the recent Washington Post allegation that Trump shared “classified” information with the Russians referencing an “unnamed source.” The Washington Post doesn’t actually care if any of it is true, they want the headline, they want to create a false scandal and all other liberal outlets are in collusion. Three people who were in the meeting denied any such conversation regarding classified information was provided to Russia, yet every single liberal news organization grabbed the headline and ran with it, they don’t care if there is any veracity to the allegation, they just want the allegation. You see they figure if they continue to make allegation after allegation even if none of it is true, they can deem his administration is doomed, they are falling apart, they are in disarray, etc. when all they are doing is promoting their own personal agenda, to get rid of Trump, no matter the wreckage they cause, no matter the lies they spew and no matter the lives they put in jeopardy.

If you simply search social media you will not find one positive story from any, and I mean any, liberal news outlet regarding President Trump since he announced his intention to run for president as a Republican.  Recently he gave a medal to a soldier, and there was negative spin, then he spoke at the National Police Officers Memorial, again negative spin and just this weekend he gave a commencement speech, not surprisingly negative spin, nothing positive, nothing at all and the mainstream media isn’t about to reward any of his efforts, it goes against their core. These are just a couple examples of some positive things any president would expect to be at least recognized for doing, yet the liberal mainstream media (ABC, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, Politico, The Hill, etc. like I had to actually name them for you to know who I was referencing) is working together in an effort to delegitimize President Trump simply because their preferred candidate didn’t win.

That is all these daily attacks are about and they are planning on “convincing” the US and the world by using the squeaky wheel approach. The more you whine, complain, accuse, circumvent, attack someone the more you are able to more easily convince those susceptible to persuasion they are correct when all they are doing is colluding into one force to promote, propagandize, their deep desire to do anything to get Trump out.

LendingTree

The mainstream media will go to any length, at any cost, to oust Trump, even if it means installing a traitor/leaker into meetings at the White House, tapping phones lines, etc. and disclosing sensitive information which put American lives at risk. That is how deplorable these individuals are, they are willing to sacrifice Americans security to promote their agenda and it is becoming extremely obvious and dangerous.

vudu.com

Today there was a headline from Fox News outlining Democrats calling for Trump’s impeachment, and what is the allegation, that he fired someone he had absolute authority to fire, someone who every democrat now calling for impeachment wanted fired back in November. Can you say hypocrite! No, the left cannot possibly be subjected to an accusation of hypocrisy because they have removed that word from their collective minds, their collusive, propagandists, vitriolic, hateful minds.

They hope to persuade you that Trump is a liar, he is incompetent, he is a loose cannon, he is uneducated, and unsuccessful (never mind he is a billionaire, even proven by their poster-child Rachel Maddow’s bombshell disclosure of his tax returns). So what can you do? Well don’t believe the hype to borrow a term from old school rap group Public Enemy, don’t buy into what they are selling. This type of reporting didn’t work back in November and it certainly shouldn’t now, even if they are doubling, tripling down on their attacks.

Use your common sense, don’t buy into their clickbait, their irresponsible reporting, their complete lack of any moral compass and just don’t read their garbage. Even a child can see what the liberal mainstream media is up to, and that is how they treat the country, like little children who should follow and believe their every word. So, let’s agree to reciprocate, let’s treat them like children, the petulant children they are and simply ignore them and let them throw their tantrum for eight years then we will be ready for President Pence!

Hillary is living in another world!

comey

Undoubtedly many of you read or saw the video wherein Ms. Bill Clinton told a group of women she would have won but for James Comey. Still lingering and festering about the November election results, she just can’t accept full and complete blame for her poorly run campaign and lack of any real policy commitment or ideas. She simply ran on the heels of her disastrous Secretary of State record. I’m serious, I dare one liberal to name one thing she did as Secretary of State or Senator of NY which was worthy of acknowledgment.

LendingTree

Liberals keep accusing Trump of still touting his election win, so what! You don’t think for one second Hillary would be talking about her win, heck Democrats can’t stop talking about the loss. Daily they complain about everything Trump and how Hillary got screwed by Comey and Russia – never mind the fact there is absolutely no proof of either. Recently on my Twitter page a clear troll alleged President Trump was the only one still talking about the election results…ha! Just watch CNN, MSNBC, ABCNEWS et al and you will see daily whining about the election results from liberals still in disbelief. It is so fun to watch the liberal tears fall.

vudu.com

So back to Hillary, for her to keep accusing others for her terrible outcome is just pathetic. Do you not recall how she sent out Podesta to tell her “followers” they would keep fighting and wait to see the results still come in while simultaneously conceding, behind their backs, to Trump. She is not a genuine person, clearly half the country saw that and to this day she continues to live in her fantasy land. It is funny now, but will some day soon be very sad.

The Truth about the James Comey firing – was it constitutional?

Rod_Rosenstein_US_Attorneycomey

Liberal pundits are describing Trump’s recent firing of James Comey with irresponsible phrases such as “hint of fascism” “constitutional crisis” “something a dictator would do” “unprecedented” “illegal” – but is it all hyperbole, crocodile tears, partisan politics?

The Constitution (if you have ever read it) actually, clearly, legally and fully authorizes the President of the United States to fire persons within in the State Department, part of his cabinet, etc. See Article II Section I:  

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.

See also, Article II, Section II, which states:

1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

2: He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

3: The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

So liberals spewing their feigned indignation about the firing being unconstitutional is absolute and utter nonsense. They are simply playing politics. The President of the United States was acting upon the recommendation of the newly appointed Assistant Attorney General (the guy who would have to directly deal with the FBI Director on a daily basis). Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was confirmed by a vote of 94-6 in the Senate just two weeks ago, yes 94-6! That means the majority of both Democrats and Republicans held him as a distinctly qualified recommendation by the President. Keep in mind also that Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and a slew of other Democrats all wanted Comey out just a few scant months ago for re-opening the investigation into Hillary Clinton (due to Huma Abedin).

Democrats will have you believe that Trump is acting as a dictator. Where do dictators take advice from not only their Assistant Attorney General but the acting Attorney General to fire someone? They don’t they just act as they wish without advice from anyone. Even if he was going to do it anyway without the recommendation, it doesn’t make him a dictator you idiots. He has the absolute constitutional authority and both sides of the aisle at one point or another wanted Comey out anyway, so all the liberals spreading their false allegations of wrongdoing, illegal actions, demagoguery, unconstitutionality really expose them for what they truly are, sore losers, cry-babies, whiny little partisan cowards.

LendingTree

Side note: Elizabeth Warren apparently knows the reason was due to the Russian investigation – you know the one with absolutely no evidence whatsoever which shows Trump or anyone in his cabinet did anything illegal and which also fails to show Russia had anything to do with our November Presidential election result, of course Democrats will daily tell you they suspect something, and in the case of Warren, she actually knows! Really Elizabeth, you know throwing out an accusation against the President of the United States like that with no evidence to support is actually is a civil wrong, it is called defamation (slander).

The fact of the matter is Democrats are displaying their hypocrisy in full and clear view of the American people and we all notice. They are simply preaching to their sheep and the media is eating it up, spitting it back out, actually working in concert with liberals against Trump, it is more than obvious to anyone with a brain. However I suspect 46 people in the Senate and 188 Representatives are akin to the scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz or at least don’t bother to use what God gave them.  Remember also last week how Hillary Clinton was blaming Comey for her loss in the election, yes just last week! Democrats all wanted Comey gone and Hillary would have done it on the first day if she had won.

I believe the reason for so much false outrage by the left is because the new FBI Director will inevitably review the information (something Fox News is already talking about) regarding Comey and the decision not to go after Hillary, and others. Remember, under Comey, her staffers were allowed to literally use hammers to destroy evidence with immunity.  I would love to see an indictment of Hillary and her cohorts after Comey’s clear error on July 5th.  Hillary, watch out dear!

Now let’s remember what happened the last time the mainstream media acted in concert with liberals…Trump Trump Trump!

vudu.com

Comey, Comey, Comey!

comey

Remember the Brady Bunch kiddos!  Yesterday’s firing of James Comey and liberals reaction reminded me of Jan’s proverbial “Marsha, Marsha, Marsha!” Every liberal in America is losing their minds over the firing but it is comically hypocritical due to their opinions about him last year when they were calling for his head due to his re-opening of the Hillary Clinton investigation.

Back then libs wanted Obama to fire him for meddling in the election and wanted Comey to go. Almost every Republican or Democrat at some point wanted his head and just because Trump had the audacity to actually do it, it drives liberals crazy! They will point to the timing of the firing, but you know what, who cares! The deputy AG, recently confirmed 96-4 by the Senate, was the one who recommended it happen. Does the timing really matter or did Trump do it just to further liberals incessant whining. Only Trump knows, but the fact of the matter is I don’t care.

LendingTree

This guy is gone, he should have been gone in on July 5th when he recommended no action against Hillary then he should have been gone when he re-opened the investigation. Comey clearly loves the limelight, he relished in the Congressional attention and that is simply not appropriate for the FBI Director.

Furthermore, didn’t Bill Clinton do the exact same thing to Jeff Sessions back in 1993? Oh how liberals tend to forget, nay skirt over the, FACTS! Trump is simply toying with the media, the liberal #fakenews and it drives them absolutely batty. It is going to be a fun 3 1/2 years, and definitely 7 1/2 if the media keeps up the crybaby nature of its’ “reporting.”

There are truly no journalists any longer, simply propaganda spewers. Trumps does it again and CNN, MSNBC, ABC and the rest are foolishly taking the bait. Trump isn’t brilliant but he knows how to get their goat!

vudu.com

Pornography, perceptions and partisanship.

couple

Sometimes we might see an actor on television or in a movie and exclaim “who the heck is that?” I recently watched a comedy movie and it was clear that a character being showcased was meant to be, not a main character but, a meaningful character in the movie and the way he was presented we should take note of his scene.  The person I am referring to is Ron Jeremy. Some reading this may immediately recognize that name while others may say exactly what I put in quotes previously (who the heck is that). When those who know him explain to those who don’t, inevitably someone would say he’s a “Porn Star.” Now how they know who he is, no one necessarily needs to share, but I can tell you I can’t name a single porn star.

Look I’m no prude, of course in my lifetime I have seen an adult video or clip, I’m 45 years old and I’m not a saint, but can’t name a porn star. I can, however, name some “Adult Film Actors.” Two names I know are Jenna Jameson (she was on Bill O’Reilly once) and Mike Holmes (there was a movie loosely based on his life called Boogie Nights with Burt Reynolds, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Mark Wahlberg) but that is about the extent of my knowledge in that area.  Again not a prude and I have seen porn in my lifetime but I certainly didn’t want to know the actors’ names, etc. The purpose of this article is to decipher why we are partisan in our description of certain titles. What makes some of us give a different title to essentially the same thing?

Take for example the aforementioned Porn Star reference and juxtapose it with Adult Film Star. They essentially describe the same person except for one small difference to many. Many people don’t consider those who engage in pornography “stars.” Many people would say they are “adult film actors” while some may call them much more negative terms, but let’s just utilize these two terms for the purposes of this article. Now, why does it matter what we call them, i.e. Porn Star versus Adult Film Actor? Well, to start with, in my opinion, the term “star” implies more than what the actor deserves. The term star is meant to be a mostly positive connotation, a form of praise or adulation for someone who is accomplished.  Is it all that difficult to be a popular person, “a star,” as a young attractive female if you engage in detailed, graphic sex on screen? Of course not, every 14 year old boy on earth would love to see that and will google the name to see more, but to call her a star is a stretch. She is an actor, involved in pornography, but an actor, not a star. Does it take talent to engage in that activity, no! Believe it or not the two dumbest people on earth would find a way to have sex. Like I said, I am no prude, and I am not here to judge that actor but I won’t praise the behavior, because morally I disagree with pornography.

vudu.com

Again, I am no saint, I have engaged in numerous sins throughout my life but I recognize when it happens and I do what I need to in order to atone. I’m not here to preach to you, you may be agnostic or an atheist, my point is that titles can lead to certain perceptions. Would you want your 21 year old daughter to come home with a new boyfriend and when you ask him what he does for a living he proudly states he is a “porn star.” I am certain most fathers would not deem that young man who just walked in the door with their daughter a star, unless he was thinking, “yeah, more like ‘star’ of my next trip to the gun range.”

Should someone be praised for something you may not necessarily agree with?  I don’t mean to go off on a tangent here, I am just demonstrating how individuals might look at something like pornography. Obviously, some see it as disgusting, vile, a sin, while others might deem it art, seductive, intriguing. Personally I think porn kills love. I am going to give credit for that, I recently saw that phrase on a t-shirt and could not agree more. We are, mostly, all very interested in sex, it is human nature, it is very enjoyable but if you believe like I do, it is meant for a husband and wife. When we give a title like “porn star” to an actor, it glorifies that activity, calling them “adult film actors” doesn’t even demean them, but it changes the perception of the industry.

LendingTree

My article is not meant to be about pornography in general (sorry 14 year old boys, no nude pics here) but about perceptions. We are political here, clearly with a conservative skew. So on the prior topic I am not claiming that all liberals would call Jenna Jameson a Porn Star while all conservatives deem her an Adult Film Actress, but what about other terms and their partisan perceptions.

Take for example immigrants to our country who are here without obtaining citizenship. From the left we hear them called “undocumented immigrants” or “undocumented workers” while on the right “illegal aliens” or “illegal immigrants.” What is the difference? Undeniably each term holds a certain perception, depending upon your political affiliation. The left’s perception is that they are migrant workers here to seek freedom and pursuit of happiness (and to give us votes, lol).  On the other hand the conservatives might view them as M-13 gang members here to rape and rob our daughters and wives (all illegals are bad!).  (I don’t believe this by the way). You can see how simply giving a term to something tends to skew to your political direction/beliefs because of our perceptions.

Here are some common terms/phrases the left and right use to describe different activities while essentially meaning the same thing but depending upon who utters them they take on particular political connotations:

Rioting, Protesting, Demonstrating, Gathering, Marching, Bad Optics, Discouraged, Disappointed, Propaganda, Mercurial, Alt-Right, Alt-Left, Patriot, Tea Party, Reckless, Scandal, Unethical, Definition of what Sex is, Make America Great Again, Locker Room Talk, Bleachbit, Demagogue, Emails, Congress, Radical Islamic Terrorism, Refugee, Political Correctness, Deplorable, Hypocrisy, Fiasco, Transparent, Truthful, Wikileaks, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Mission Accomplished, Let me be clear, Trust me, Make no mistake, Victim, Triggered, Snowflake, Micro-Aggression, Free-Speech

Depending upon your political views, you probably have a version of each of the terms listed above with which you can appreciate and connect. The point of my article, and yes I troll on twitter all the time but I am doing it as satire, is to be cognizant of what you hear and the purpose behind the term. Know its definition, its use and how you perceive it, its’ nomenclature. Don’t just use just one term over and again as a talking point, let the politicians do that.

Sometimes we fall prey to the normalization of words or terms which have completely separate perceptions depending upon the origination of utterance, so all I’m suggesting is that before you use one term for something maybe use an alternative term to shake things up.  So instead of Porn Star or Adult Film Actor maybe you describe them as a Person Engaged in Coitus For Monetary Gain and Scant Celebrity.

Stacy Adams